Last-Mile Internet Access #
Def.: The final leg between the telecommunications network (cable, Internet, etc) and the end user (home, university, cellphone, etc)
- Tends to be the most bandwidth-constrained, as it costs lots of money to invest in infrastructure to everywhere
History of last-mile #
- Early 90s: 56k dialup was the way to connect
- Leveraged existing telephone network to connect homes to the internet
- However: very slow, and restricted by modems themselves - 56kbps was theoretical maximum, in reality was ~30-40kbps
- Also: Could not use phone and internet at the same time
- Late 90s: Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)
- Different frequency channel (so different hardware) - allows people to use phone and internet at the same time
- Early on, up to 256k speeds
- Much of the world still uses DSL
- Early 00s: cable internet
- Core idea: use cable television network for internet; typically copper cables or copper/fiber hybrid
- 80% of Americans use cable to connect to “broadband” (defined by FCC as stable, 25mbps DL, 3mbps UL, but term has been diluted by cable companies)
- Even still, 21M Americans don’t have broadband access; 1/2 of global population does not either
- Caused cable TV companies to become ISPs
- 2010s: Fiber-to-the-Premises
- Available in densely populated areas in developed regions
- Major US, European players, e.g. Google, Verizon, etc; smaller players are getting in as well
- However, very costly: $27k per mile of fiber
- Main areas of investment:
- Wired (cables)
- Copper, coax at last mile, but could be fiber in developed regions
- Fiber in backhaul/backbone
- Wireless
- Satellite
- Cell towers
- New moonshots
- Wired (cables)
Telecom topology #
- National backbone network (core): submarine cables that terminate at points of presence (PoPs)
- Middle-mile network (backhaul): satellite, fiber, or cellular connections terminating at base station tower or local PoP
- Last-mile network (access): wireless/wired connection to home or cellular divice
“Dig-Once” policies #
- When doing other infra. projects (e.g. construction, sewage), build in broadband connection you need instead of separately
- Estimated to save $126B of $140B of nationwide fiber cost
- However: only 16 states have implemented policies - CA included
- Nationwide legislation stonewalled, due to lobbying from larger telco providers as the policies would give smaller regional providers low-cost access to building fiber
Mobile networks #
- Exploded in popularity in the last 20 years as cheaper alternative to broadband access than fiber
- 4G networks offer broadband speed, but expensive to build: ~$200k per cell tower
- Generations (every generation, ~10x increase in bandwidth):
- 1G: basic voice calling services
- 2G: Voice calls, text messages, limited browsing
- 3G: Broadband, video conferencing, GPS
- 4G LTE: “Long-Term Evolution” transition phase to 4G, but not actually 4G
- 4G: high-speed apps, mobile TV, wearable devices
- 5G: HD streaming, IoT, autonomous vehicles
5G networks #
- More than just increased bandwidth compared to 4G; 5G networks are expected to eventually support:
- Enhanced mobile broadband: extreme data rates, extreme capacity
- Mission-critical control: ultra-low density, ultra-high availability, extremely mobility
- Massive IoT: devices with ultra-low energy, ultra-high density
- Improvements in how data is multiplexed onto radio spectrum
- New frequency bands: Higher frequency generally means faster data rates, but less coverage and range
Cloudification of access #
- Cellular networks have been historically extremely opaque: proprietary hardware, slow to innovate
- Industry is re-architecting access network using principles of SDN: run 5G network functions in the cloud rather than on purpose-built applications
- Win-win: network operators get faster innovation and CAPEX savings; cloud providers get low-latency connectivity to end-users on their devices
Satellite networks #
- Works through connection of satellites (often privately operated) that are flying in geostationary orbit (35km above)
- Connections are SLOW
- Costly to build, deploy, and operate, and thus costly to purchase
- 25mbps from Comcast: $30/mo (in theory)
- 25mbps from Viasat: $150/mo
Internet encroachment on TV spectrum #
- In ~2007: researchers started to look into using TV (lower-band) channels for long-range communication for Internet connectivity
- Lower band: can travel greater distances and move over more obstacles; cheaper to deploy and requires lower base stations
- Idea: use whitespaces (gaps in TV-allocated frequencies)
- Protests from TV companies, until FCC cleared the concerns in 2019